Who needs to make this decision?

Non-Airbnb hosts considering a room check

Operators considering indoor monitoring for a specific purpose need to assess whether it is necessary, proportionate and transparent to guests. The Information Commissioner’s Office advises organisations to consider less intrusive security options when CCTV is not necessary for their purpose.

Hosts who need a visible privacy control

Where indoor monitoring is appropriate under the actual letting arrangement, a shutter or lens-concealment control can make the camera’s privacy state easier to see. TP-Link and Ring describe such controls on specific indoor models; the feature does not itself permit monitoring.

Hosts checking a defined area of a larger room

Operators considering broader coverage should define the area they need to see before choosing pan/tilt or local recording. They also need to check the property’s Wi-Fi and upload connection: stored footage and a working remote live view are different requirements.

What matters before choosing a camera?

Start with the booking platform and the purpose of the room check. Only if indoor monitoring remains an appropriate option should camera coverage and connection requirements determine the model.

Concern What to check Who this matters to
Platform rules and privacy Check every booking platform’s indoor-camera policy, the exact room and purpose, guest communication and whether a less intrusive measure would suffice. If I cannot justify filming guests in the room, camera features will not solve the problem. Around 44% of consumers put platform rules and privacy first.
Viewing area and detail Define the required view, then check the stated field of view or pan/tilt range and how recording behaves in the room’s lighting. For a larger permitted viewing area, I need to see the relevant part of the room without capturing more than the purpose requires. Room coverage is the primary concern for around 33% of consumers.
Connection and recordings Check router-band compatibility and upload guidance, plus the exact model’s local-storage requirements and who can access recordings. When the property’s connection is unreliable, I need to know whether remote viewing and recording will work as intended. Around 23% of consumers prioritise connection and recording arrangements.

Mistakes to avoid

  • Choosing a camera before checking the booking platform

    Airbnb prohibits cameras and recording devices monitoring a listing’s interior, even when switched off. A camera’s privacy settings do not change that policy.

    Check every platform used for the let before comparing models. For an Airbnb listing, consider a non-camera measure or an exterior-camera arrangement that meets Airbnb’s conditions instead of monitoring inside.

  • Treating privacy mode as permission to monitor

    A shutter or app control changes what a device can capture; it does not establish that indoor monitoring is necessary or transparent to guests. The Information Commissioner’s Office advises organisations to consider whether a less intrusive option can meet their purpose.

    Set out the specific purpose and viewing area, check the applicable platform and property arrangements, and decide how guests will be informed before relying on a privacy control.

  • Assuming local recording needs no further attention

    TP-Link describes microSD storage for the Tapo C225, but the card must be checked for the exact model and handled securely. Recording locally does not resolve who may access footage or when it should be deleted.

    Confirm whether a compatible card is included, its supported capacity and who can remove it. Establish a retention and deletion process before recording.

    Removable storage also needs secure handling and periodic checks.

  • Assuming the property’s Wi-Fi will suit any camera

    Indoor models differ in Wi-Fi-band support, and an inadequate upload connection can affect remote viewing. Ring lists 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi for Indoor Cam (2nd Gen), while Reolink lists dual-band Wi-Fi for E1 Pro.

    Check the router’s bands and security settings, signal at the planned position and the model’s upload guidance. Guest access to Wi-Fi alone does not establish camera compatibility.

Relevant brands and models

TP-Link Tapo

The Tapo C225 is a pan/tilt model to consider where a visible privacy control is important and indoor monitoring is appropriate for the letting arrangement.

  • TP-Link lists 2K QHD video, night vision, microSD support up to 512 GB and a privacy shield operated from the camera or app. TP-Link says its Privacy Mode stops video and audio streaming and recording.
  • The shield does not override a platform prohibition or establish that monitoring is justified. Check the property’s Wi-Fi settings and the card requirements for the exact model.

eufy

Indoor Cam S350 offers pan/tilt coverage for a defined viewing area in a larger room, provided that monitoring the area is appropriate.

  • eufy lists 4K wide-angle and 2K telephoto cameras, 8× hybrid zoom, local storage, a privacy mode and dual-band Wi-Fi 6.
  • A wider potential view can capture more of the room than the purpose requires. Define the permitted viewing area rather than treating maximum coverage as the goal.

Reolink

E1 Pro is a pan/tilt option for operators assessing local recording and coverage of a defined area.

  • Reolink lists 5MP video, dual-band Wi-Fi, person and pet detection, auto tracking, microSD support up to 512 GB and a privacy mode that turns the camera away.
  • Tracking can extend what is monitored. Removable footage still needs controlled access and retention, and a turned-away lens does not make prohibited indoor use permissible.

Ring

Indoor Cam (2nd Gen) is a fixed-view option for a defined area where a built-in privacy cover is preferred.

  • Ring lists a built-in privacy cover, 1080p video, colour night vision and customisable motion zones.
  • Its stated view is fixed rather than pan/tilt, and it uses 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi only. Ring recommends an upload speed of 2 Mbps for this model.

Joybuy products

Related products coming soon.

Common questions

Can an Airbnb host put an indoor camera in a holiday let?

No. Airbnb prohibits hosts from having cameras or recording devices that monitor any interior space of a listing, even when the devices are switched off or disconnected.

Does a privacy shutter make indoor monitoring acceptable?

No. A shutter can visibly block a lens, but it does not override Airbnb’s interior-camera prohibition. In another letting arrangement, the operator still needs to assess the purpose, guest transparency and whether a less intrusive measure would work.

Should I leave audio recording on for a room check?

Do not assume audio is needed for the room check. The Information Commissioner’s Office notes that CCTV can capture people’s voices as personal information; check whether the model lets you disable audio and assess any proposed use separately from video.

What should I check before installing a camera in a non-Airbnb let?

Check the other booking platform’s rules, the specific room and purpose, property permission, guest communication and whether a less intrusive option meets the need. If indoor monitoring remains appropriate, confirm the viewing area, audio controls, Wi-Fi compatibility, access to recordings and how the device will be secured or disabled between stays.